Word Processing Assessment

 

Guidelines for Word Processing Assessments.

  Product  Personal Responsibility
4
  • All parts of the complete, well done, and follows the spirit of the assignment.
  • Graphics show thought and planning, and show an understanding of imaging theory.
  • Styles have readable, pleasing fonts. Any special formatting or text by the author has been faithfully reproduced.
  • The product shows an understanding of word processing functions.
  • The book looks professional.
  • Overcame problems as they arose.
  • Made effective use of class time.
  • Made effective use of the help file, CoWeb, classmates, and other resources.
  • Only asked questions after researching the problem..
  • Worked effectively with others and shared knowledge.
  • Worked on the project outside of class as needed.
3
  • The book is mostly complete, but may be missing minor parts, or have a minor errors, such as lack of styles for the body.
  • Fonts are readable.
  • Graphics show some thought and planning and show some understanding of imaging theory.
  • The product shows a general understanding of word processing functions.
  • Overall, the book looks mostly professional.
  • Addressed some problems as they arose.
  • Sometimes asked questions before using other resources.
  • Made mostly effective use of class time.
  • Usually worked effectively with others and shared knowledge.
2
  • The book is partially complete, but substantial parts may be missing, incomplete, or poorly done.
  • Fonts may be unreadable or poorly chosen.
  • Graphics do not show much thought or planning, or show little evidence of an understanding of imaging theory.
  • The product shows a limited understanding of word processing functions.
  • The book does not look professional
  • Seldom addressed problems as they arose.
  • Seldom used other resources.
  • Asked continuous questions without reading the assignment or help file.
  • Had more than a little non-productive time in class. 
1
  • The book is essentially the text document with very little evidence of work.
  • The product shows almost no understanding of word processing functions.
  • Did not address problems.
  • Did not make effective use of class time.
0
  • Not enough work completed for assessment.
  • Not enough work completed for assessment.
 

Last updated 10/22/2004

   

This site best viewed with 2001 or later versions of Netscape, Internet Explorer, Mozilla, or Opera.

Original Content ©2001-2004 by Derrel Fincher. Other rights reserved by individual authors